home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PSUHMC.BITNET!JCLUTCHE
- Message-ID: <MAILBOOK%93012711272667@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 11:24:00 EST
- Sender: RiceMail discussion list <MAILBOOK@RICEVM1.BITNET>
- From: JCLUTCHE@PSUHMC.BITNET
- Subject: original "from" "to" question
- Lines: 69
-
- I have a request not to receive the original "from" and "to"
- when replying to a message.
- Is this a SMTP issue or RiceMail?
- Do any other institutions have a problem with the "from" "to" options?
- Any thoughts or suggestions?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- John Clutcher, Project Leader/E-mail Postmaster Information Systems
- Internet: jclutche@psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu Hershey Medical Center
- Bitnet: jclutche@psuhmc.bitnet 500 University Drive
- Voice: (717) 531-8682 Hershey, PA 17033 USA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- ---- Original Message Follows -----
-
- >Received: from chameleon.cit.hmc.psu.edu by psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu
- > (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; Tue, 26 Jan 93 11:54:21 EST
- >Return-Path: <xxxxx@cit.hmc.psu.edu>
- >Received: by chameleon.cit.hmc.psu.edu (4.1/1.34)
- > id AA05370; Tue, 26 Jan 93 11:53:17 EST
- >Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 11:53:17 EST
- >From: xxxxx@cit.hmc.psu.edu (xxxxxx xxxxx)
- >Message-Id: <xxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxx@chameleon.cit.hmc.psu.edu>
- >To: xxxxxxxx@psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu
- >Subject: Strange mail headers from PSUHMC
- >Cc: xxxxx@chameleon.cit.hmc.psu.edu, xxxxx@chameleon.cit.hmc.psu.edu,
- > xxxxxxxx@psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu
- >
- >John:
- >
- >I may have mentioned this previously, but is it possible to change the
- >header rewriting rules for mail messages that are forwarded/replied
- >using Ricemail? In the example below, I sent Pam a email and she then
- >replied to my message, but the sender (From:) and the recipient's
- >addresses (To:) are left unchanged - instead the new header fields
- >Resent-* are added. It appears that this is nonstandard for Internet
- >correspondence.
- >
- >When conversing with hundreds of other Internet nodes who use many
- >different mail packages, I have never seen the original Sender address
- >maintained after one or more forwards of the message.
- >
- >Any ideas?
- >
- >Thanks for your help
- >xxx
- >
- >----- Begin Included Message -----
- >
- >From xxxxxxxx@psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu Tue Jan 26 08:52:59 1993
- >Resent-Message-Id: <xxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxx@sys-a.cit.hmc.psu.edu>
- >Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 08:53:41 EST
- >Resent-From: xxx xx <xxxxxxxx@psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu>
- >Resent-To: xxx xxxxx <xxxxx@sys-a>
- >Resent-Cc: "xxxxxx xx xxxxxx" <xxxxxxx@sys-a>
- >Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 08:47:40 EST
- >From: xxxxx@chameleon.cit.hmc.psu.edu (xxxxxx xxxxx)
- >To: xxxxxxxL@psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu
- >Subject: Re: Maintenance for Delta
- >Cc: xxxxx@chameleon.cit.hmc.psu.edu, xxxxxxxx@psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu
- >Content-Length: 2200
- >
- >xxx,
- >I'll ask xxxxxx to type the PO today.
- >
- >----------------------------Original message----------------------------
- >
- >
- >----- End Included Message -----
- >
-