home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ERS.BITNET!MAINT2
- Message-ID: <HISTORY%93012508171917@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.history
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 08:12:15 EST
- Sender: History <HISTORY@PSUVM.BITNET>
- From: Ken Koester <MAINT2@ERS.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: Large lecture sections
- In-Reply-To: Message of Sun,
- 24 Jan 1993 16:31:56 +0100 from <ccurrie@CLUS1.ULC C.AC.UK>
- Lines: 13
-
- On Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:31:56 +0100 Christopher Currie said:
- >
- >Especially as the question has been so phrased that none of the answers
- >offered is right.
- >
- >As every schoolboy knows, William defeated Harold at Battle, not
- >at Hastings. That the battle has been known as the 'battle of
- >Hastings' since the 12th century or earlier is one of those
- >nuances that multiple-choice questions can't expose. You can't call it
- >the Battle of Battle without sounding silly.
- >
- Umm. I found myself more interested in the nuance of whether William defeated
- Harold, or Harold defeated himself (-:
-