home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.history
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!akerr
- From: akerr@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Austin Kerr)
- Subject: multiple choice exams
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.155526.25092@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
- Sender: news@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bottom.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Organization: The Ohio State University
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 15:55:26 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- I am curious how many schools are forced, by virtue of class sizes, to
- administer machine-readable multiple choice examinations to history classes.
-
- I once attended a seminar on testing, where the expert in charge observed that
- most multiple choice tests were of poor quality. He said that multiple choice
- tests that observed higher order learning, short of "synthesis," were possible
- to write, but very time consuming to write, with intricate requirements of
- pretesting, item analysis--I forget all the jargon. He spent 8 hours writing
- three rough draft questions; over his career he had built up a bank of
- questions to draw upon. He did not address how he dealt with problems of
- security on tests or questions used more than one time.
-
- Clearly multiple choice questions in history classes are appropriate for
- observing lower order learning. I have often administered multiple choice
- quizzes that quickly give me a chance to observe if the students have
- understood major points, and give them quick feedback on their understanding of
- those points. Last term I used quizzes for those objectives, and out-of-class
- papers for the higher order objectives. One advantage for me was reading
- printed essays instead of hastily written scrawl!
-
-
-
-
- ajor points
- --
- K. Austin Kerr direct line to office 614-292-2613
- Professor of History department line 292-2674
- Ohio State University fax 292-2282
- Columbus, Ohio 43210 USA e mail kerr.6@osu.edu
-