home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!wvnvm!scmcc
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 10:36:48 EST
- From: Stephen McCluskey <SCMCC@wvnvm.wvnet.edu>
- Message-ID: <93023.103648SCMCC@wvnvm.wvnet.edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.history
- Subject: Re: Large lecture sections
- References: <HISTORY%93012112201108@RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU>
- Lines: 17
-
- The discussion so far suggests that the key to teaching history
- is to have some close contact between an instructor and individual
- students.
- One way to do it is the "small liberal arts college" model; where
- you have classes under 50, taught by the professor. There aren't any
- grad students so there are no TA's.
- The other way is the university "monster class" of 250+. This only
- works with small discussion sections (ca. 25 students) taught by TA's who
- can talk with students and (realistically most important) read their
- written work.
- The compromise that seems to promise disaster is the large section
- (ca. 100 students) taught by an unaided professor. This leads to lack of
- contact with students, simplistic assignments and examinations, and is
- pobably a certain way to disillusion students on whatever subject is being
- taught.
-
- -- Steve McCluskey
-