home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ASUACAD.BITNET!ATGVG
- Message-ID: <EDPOLYAN%93012622250329@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edpolyan
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:54:47 MST
- Sender: Professionals and Students Discussing Education Policy Analysis
- <EDPOLYAN@ASUACAD.BITNET>
- From: Gene V Glass <ATGVG@ASUACAD.BITNET>
- Subject: A message to Mr. Secretary
- Lines: 57
-
- Maybe this can help start off a discussin of the Ed research
- priorities.
-
- One could either just start listing pet ideas or projects, or one
- could think for a moment about what makes one ed res endeavor a priority
- over another. Or, by what standard are priorites established? Or, what
- justifies one thing having higher prioity than another OERI, the research
- arm of the Dept of Ed?
- A couple of criteria come to mind: 1) priorities could be set on the
- basis of societal need (AIDS education research; educ for homeless children;
- educating children of poor single-parent families; and the like); 2) or the
- priorities could be established with respect to those areas in the scientific
- study of education that are ripe for major break-throughs (basic research on
- human cognition, studies of language development in neo-nates, and the like);
- 3) or priorities could be set in terms of right visons of what education
- should be (critique of curriculum and schooling more broadly, curriculum
- research, technology development, etc); 4) or priorities could be set in
- political terms (research on teacher professionalism, including empowerment,
- action research and related movements; research on the "principalship";
- research on governmental management of schooling, and the like).
-
- Permit me to give an opinion about how we set the priorities.
-
- Education is no science. Nothing like it has ever yielded its mysteries
- to scientific investigation (and please don't tell me I'm wrong because
- social psychology or "communications" are sciences, because all I will do
- is end up losing friends who are social psychologists or communications
- scientists). There is no basic research in education worth doing. If it's
- truly basic, it will be done elsewhere. In short, basic research--lose it!
- Education is not a science; it's a debate, an argument. We should not be
- discouraged that we argue about education; that is fundamentally what
- it is all about. This LIST educates, because people discuss ideas, values
- and the aims of schooling. Some people expect educational research to be
- like a bunch of engineers working on the fastest, cheapest and safest
- way of traveling to Chicago, when in fact it is a bunch of people arguing
- about whether to go to Chicago or St Louis. And I don't write this to
- mock educators or ourselves. The process of educating is fundamentally
- this way. It could not be otherwise.
-
- "Societal needs" for setting research priorities? I think I like it.
-
- "Political interests" as a means of defing the research agenda? I think
- I like it too. More research on teachers. Why have you never seen or heard
- of a research study on the effects of sabbaticals on teachers attitude and
- performance? Because teachers have not been defining the research agenda;
- politicians and administrators have, and so we have a jillion studies
- to prove that large classes are as good as small classes and that more
- money for education "doesn't make a difference."
-
- I'm tired.
-
- -------**********======================================**********-------
- GENE V GLASS ATGVG at ASUACAD.BITNET
- College of Education ATGVG at ASUACVAX.BITNET
- Arizona State University Internet Address:ATGVG@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU
- Tempe, AZ 85287-2411
- 602-965-2692
-