home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!FAC.ANU.EDU.AU!ANDALING
- Return-Path: <@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU:andaling@durras.anu.edu.au>
- Message-ID: <9301251852.AA25349@fac.anu.edu.au>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:52:58 EST
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: Avery Andrews <andaling@FAC.ANU.EDU.AU>
- Subject: formulations & gain
- Lines: 8
-
- [Avery.Andrews 930126.510]
- Rick Marken 930125
-
- Indeed high-gain systems maintain the perceptions at the references
- pretty closely, but if the feedback systems involved in kinesthetic
- movement control are high gain, then Schmidt & Bizzi have some
- excellent arguments against this kind of control! (as the norm,
- for certain kinds of movements).
-