home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!COURIER4.AERO.ORG!MARKEN
- Return-Path: <@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU:Marken@courier4.aero.org>
- Posted-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 08:31:20 -0800
- X400-Trace: US**AEROSPACE; arrival Mon, 25 Jan 93 08:31:20 -0800 action Relayed
- P1-Message-Id: US**AEROSPACE; 930125163120
- Ua-Content-Id: CSI NC V2.1b
- Message-ID: <0003343B.MAI*Marken@courier4.aero.org>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 08:31:20 -0800
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: Marken@COURIER4.AERO.ORG
- Subject: formulations
- Lines: 68
-
- [From Rick Marken (930125.0800)]
-
- Avery Andrews (930125.1610) --
-
- >The bad guys say:
-
- > Perception guides action
-
- >What Rick Marken says may (I hope) be paraphrased as:
-
- > Perception of the net effects of disturbances on a controlled
- > variable guides action
-
- I hate to be a pain in the ass about this, but that's not quite
- what I meant either. I meant:
-
- Perception (of ANYTHING) does not guide action: action
- guides (controls) perception.
-
- All this is just based on the two basic laws of control system
- operation:
-
- 1) p = r
-
- 2) o = -kd
-
- The equals signs are actually approximations (which I can't
- easily notate on the net) but VERY VERY CLOSE approx-
- imations when loop gain is HIGH.
-
- Law 1 says that perception depends on the setting of the
- reference signal: perception is a dependent variable, the
- reference signal is the independent variable. This law (fact)
- of control is the basis of the title of Bill's book Behavior:
- The control of perception. This is because we usually think
- of behavior as a dependent variable that the actor is in
- some sense "responsible" for. In a control loop, the only
- dependent variable that fits this description is perception.
-
- Law 2 says that output (or action) is negatively related to
- the disturbance. The disturbance is the net influence of the
- environment on the controlled perception, p; the action is
- the net influence of the actor on the controlled perception.
- The important (and AMAZING) thing to notice about
- equation 2 is that p does NOT appear in it (on the left
- OR right). The output (in a high gain, negative feedback
- loop) depends ENTIRELY on the disturbance, which in
- many cases (such as compensatory tracking) CAN NOT
- EVEN BE PERECIVED. But whether d can be perceived
- or not is irrelevant; the fact of the matter is that action
- (output) depends ONLY on the disturbance AS AN UN-
- SENSED ASPECT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.
-
- From a conventional (S-R) point of view, law 2 is
- just flat out magic or mysticism. As I said, it is just
- something that you have to accept (like mass attract-
- ion) even though it seems to completely contradict
- everyday experience.
-
- This is why modelling (even in very simple situations)
- is so important for understanding and accepting PCT;
- it helps if you can see with your own eyes that Law 2
- really does hold for a high gain closed negative feedback
- loop.
-
- Best
-
- Rick
-