home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!FAC.ANU.EDU.AU!ANDALING
- Return-Path: <@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU:andaling@durras.anu.edu.au>
- Message-ID: <9301240126.AA18529@fac.anu.edu.au>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 12:26:57 EST
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: Avery Andrews <andaling@FAC.ANU.EDU.AU>
- Subject: myths article
- Lines: 15
-
- [Avery Andrews 930123.1130]
-
- Wobbly as my grasp & background may be, I do have some ideas about how
- a feedback myths article might be organized, which go as follows:
-
- 1. Some examples of egregious blunders (to get people to see quickly
- that there is a problem).
-
- 2. The major myths & how they started.
-
- 3. Some bad effects on current research.
-
- 4. Some puzzles & anomalies that might be cleared up by the BCP approach.
-
- Avery.Andrews@anu.edu.au
-