home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: ba.politics
- Path: sparky!uunet!infoserv!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!phil
- From: phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone)
- Subject: The socialist/fascist claptrap item #1: the "Social Contract"
- Message-ID: <1993Jan27.193338.9550@netcom.com>
- Organization: Generally in favor of, but mostly random.
- References: <1k4ueaINNooa@morrow.stanford.edu> <1k6ftsINN1mv@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>
- Distribution: ba
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:33:38 GMT
- Lines: 194
-
- In article <1k6ftsINN1mv@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> stephen@orchid.UCSC.EDU (coram populo) writes:
- >In article <1k4ueaINNooa@morrow.stanford.edu> XA.U20@forsythe.stanford.edu (June Genis) writes:
- >>But what allows you to compell me to be a member of your
- >>"group".
- >>
- >Number one, you live and function ( I assume ) within the
- >social and political structure of the US. That for one, makes
- >it someone compelling to become and belong to the
- >social/political contracts that we based the operation of our
- >society on. You of course, are quite free to make change via
- >democratic processes.
-
- Hey George, did you sign your "Social Contract"? Nope, me neither. Hey,
- how about you Tony? Did you? yeah, I've never seen this "Social Contract"
- ion any kind of writing either, much less signed one.
-
- Our Declaration of Independence clearly states *why* we have instituted our
- current form of government. Not for purposes of a nonsensical social
- contract, not to serve the State, but *ONLY* to allow each and every one
- of us, as individuals, to pursue happiness. To wit:
-
- We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
- equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
- rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
- That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men,
- deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That
- whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is
- the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
- government, ...
-
- Now, just WHAT is this idiotic concept that some peoplew toss around, calling
- it the "Social Contract". Well, in essence:
-
-
- +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | |
- | From: atfurman@cup.portal.com (A T Furman) |
- | Newsgroups: ba.politics |
- | Subject: Re: Social contract? |
- | Date: 14 May 92 08:53:22 GMT |
- | |
- | We've all heard of the "Social Contract" -- the unwritten agree- |
- | ment between individuals and "society" (i.e. the government.) The |
- | following is an attempt to write down, once and for all, just |
- | what the contract is that we've all supposedly agreed to. |
- | |
- | |
- | |
- | SOCIAL CONTRACT |
- | between an individual and the United States Government |
- | |
- | |
- | WHEREAS I wish to reside on the North American continent, and |
- | WHEREAS the United States Government controls the area of the |
- | continent |
- | on which I wish to reside, and WHEREAS tacit or implied |
- | contracts are vague and therefore unenforceable, |
- | |
- | I agree to the following terms: |
- | |
- | SECTION 1: I will surrender a percentage of my property to the |
- | Government. The actual percentage will be determined by the |
- | Government and will be subject to change at any time. The amount |
- | to be surrendered may be based on my income, the value of my pro- |
- | perty, the value of my purchases, or any other criteria the |
- | Government chooses. To aid the Government in determining the |
- | percentage, I will apply for a Government identification number |
- | that I will use in all my major financial transactions. |
- | |
- | SECTION 2: Should the Government demand it, I will surrender my |
- | liberty for a period of time determined by the government and |
- | typically no shorter than two years. During that time, I will |
- | serve the Government in any way it chooses, including military |
- | service in which I may be called upon to sacrifice my life. |
- | |
- | SECTION 3: I will limit my behavior as demanded by the govern- |
- | ment. I will consume only those drugs permitted by the Govern- |
- | ment. I will limit my sexual activities to those permitted by |
- | the Government. I will forsake religious beliefs that conflict |
- | with the Government's determination of propriety. More limits |
- | may be imposed at any time. |
- | |
- | SECTION 4: In consideration for the above, the Government will |
- | permit me to find employment, subject to limits that will be |
- | determined by the Government. These limits may restrict my |
- | choice of career or the wages I may accept. |
- | |
- | SECTION 5: The Government will permit me to reside in the area |
- | of North America which it controls. Also, the Government will |
- | permit me to speak freely, subject to limits determined by the |
- | Government's Congress and Supreme Court. |
- | |
- | SECTION 6: The Government will attempt to protect my life and my |
- | claim to the property it has allowed me to keep. I agree not to |
- | hold the Government liable if it fails to protect me or my pro- |
- | perty. |
- | |
- | SECTION 7: The Government will offer various services to me. |
- | The nature and extent of these services will be determined by the |
- | Government and are subject to change at any time. |
- | |
- | SECTION 8: The Government will determine whether I may vote for |
- | certain Government officials. The influence of my vote will vary |
- | inversely with the number of voters, and I understand that it |
- | typically will be minuscule. I agree not to hold any elected |
- | Government officials liable for acting against my best interests |
- | or for breaking promises, even if those promises motivated me to |
- | vote for them. |
- | |
- | SECTION 9: I agree that the Government may hold me fully liable |
- | if I fail to abide by the above terms. In that event, the |
- | Government may confiscate any property that I have not previously |
- | surrendered to it, and may imprison me for a period of time to be |
- | determined by the Government. I also agree that the Government |
- | may alter the terms of this contract at any time. |
- | |
- | |
- | |
- | ---------------------------------- --------------- |
- | signature date |
- | |
- | |
- | |
- | Copyright 1989 by Robert E. Alexander. |
- | May be distributed freely. |
- | |
- +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
- >That is quite true. But in the larger sense of the
- >organisation, ie. government etc. you are bound somewhat more
- >tightly. And within this organisation, there are processes in
- >place that protect minorities from the tyranny of majorities.
-
- Oh? Since when? Ask any minority (try those that earn more than the
- average income) how well they are protected.
-
- >>But you can not scratch my back and then demand that I
- >>scratch yours unless I agreed to do so before you started
- >>scratching. If you as an individual have no right to compel
- >>me to scratch your back without my consent you can not cede
- >>this non-existent right to a government which you elect to
- >>represent you.
- >>
- >I am at somewhat of a loss to what it is your are trying to
- >convey. In no way do I propose that you must do something
- >without getting benefit or giving up some purported right.
- >But you have to agree that we always compromise in some form.
- >We agree to give up certain things for the good of whole.
-
- This is again *INCREDIBLY* stupid. The poster can't think at all.
-
- Sentence A: "In no way do I propose that you must do something
- without getting benefit or giving up some purported right."
-
- Then the poster goes on to directly contradict himself in the
- next two sentences:
-
- B: "But you have to agree that we always compromise in some form.
- We agree to give up certain things for the good of whole."
-
- *What* good of the whole? Who IS this "whole"? What is this "good" of the
- "whole"?
-
- What actually happens of course is that some set of people gain enough
- control of the means of coercion to force another set or sets of people
- to hand over their property at gunpoint for the first set to dispose of.
-
- Do people agree to this? Of course not -- no ONE believes that an action
- performed at gunpoint is one of "agreement".
-
-
-
- If you are mentally challenged enough to not believe this, consider this.
-
- 1. I Agree to buy my groceries at Safeway.
- 2. I Agree to pays taxes.
-
- Now, we ensure that there are NO laws that inflict punishment on me in any
- manner for failing to either buy my groceries at Safeway or to pay taxes.
-
- What happens?
-
- I continue to buy my groceries at Safeway.
-
- I immediately stop paying taxes.
-
-
-
-
- --
- There are actually people that STILL believe Love Canal was some kind of
- environmental disaster. Weird, eh?
-
- These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)
-