home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!umn.edu!math.fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!lrz-muenchen.de!regent!monu1.cc.monash.edu.au!monu6!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!DIALix!leanne
- From: leanne@DIALix.oz.au (Leanne Archer)
- Newsgroups: aus.politics
- Subject: Re: The Alliance for Democratic Reform
- Date: 22 Jan 1993 08:55:10 +0800
- Organization: DIALix Services, Perth, Western Australia
- Lines: 74
- Distribution: aus
- Message-ID: <1jngle$rvq@DIALix.oz.au>
- References: <1993Jan19.055011.26881@cs.su.oz.au> <1jkqbiINNrj1@manuel.anu.edu.au> <1993Jan21.065509.18970@cs.su.oz.au>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.dialix.oz.au
- X-Newsreader: NN version 6.4.19 #1
-
- In <1993Jan21.065509.18970@cs.su.oz.au> mrj@cs.su.oz.au (Mark James) writes:
-
- >In article <1jkqbiINNrj1@manuel.anu.edu.au> johng@cres.anu.edu.au writes:
- >>
- >>1. Why was the word "Alliance" chosen as part of the name? An
- >> alliance of what/whom?
-
- >As our brochure states: "The ALLIANCE for DEMOCRATIC REFORM aims
- >to UNITE the dozens of small groups and thousands of individuals all
- >desirous of changing the system. Our platform is deliberately LIMITED
- >in order to unite as many groups as possible and allow room for regional
- >additions and variations."
-
- >That is, strength through cooperation.
-
- Who are the actual groups which make up the political structure of the
- alliance? Are they minor parties amalgamating as one?
-
- >>
- >>2. On page 5 of the brochure there is a sentence "ADR's policy is
- >> that State Governments should be abolished". This is not
- >> presented as being part of the Core Platform. I'm not asking for
- >> a defence of this policy, but I would like to know the status of
- >> this policy, and, more generally, what is the difference between
- >> "policy" and "platform".
-
- >We certainly believe State Governments should be replaced by regional
- >governments, but as this would require a referendum we aim to build a
- >consensus for such a change through debate. It is therefore a long-term
- >goal (in contrast to our economic policies and our referendum policy).
-
- In terms of "regional" governments does that mean like local
- governments as we have now or would new areas be drawn up for the
- sake of administration?
-
- >Our platform is ADR's complete set of policies -- our manifesto.
- >ADR candidates can present an expanded platform by adding other
- >policies or by holding different opinions on some of our core platform.
-
- >I'll give a brief defence of State->regional government anyway.
- >The advantages I see are:
- > - Greater diversity of public policy solutions. Will have
- > competitive regionalism rather than competitive federalism.
- > - Will cut out one level of large bureaucracy.
- > - Greater local autonomy and responsiveness.
- > - Will stimulate decentralisation.
- > - Fits well into a multi-member constituency national
- > electoral system.
- >Of course the major challenge is to determine the division of
- >responsibilities between the national and the regional governments.
- >We must balance diversity and autonomy with efficiency and the concept
- >of a "common-wealth" (cross-subsidation and coordination between
- >regions). I don't think the change would be valid if the total
- >bureaucracy grows.
-
- >I can progressively post our policies if there is interest.
- >Alternatively I'll cop a debate on a policy of your choosing:
- >government structure, the electoral system, electronic referendums,
- >industrial relations, tariffs, taxation, employment, exchange rate policy,
- >rural support, and the environment (though I'm not an expert in the last two).
-
- >Mark
-
- What is the Alliances policy on equal opportunities or
- immigration?
-
- - Leanne
-
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | _ Ms. Leanne Archer |
- | _// |
- | / _ __. ____ ____ _ email: leanne@DIALix.oz.au |
- | /___ </_(_/|_/ / <_/ / <_</_ |
- ________________________________________________________________________
-