home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!olivea!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!scotty
- From: scotty@netcom.com (J Scott Peter)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: a/an exceptions
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.102653.13166@netcom.com>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 10:26:53 GMT
- References: <30724@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1993Jan25.170300.3332@bmerh85.bnr.ca> <C1FD2v.35x@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <C1FD2v.35x@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> norlin@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Norman Lin) writes:
- >This bugs me
- >almost as much as a passage I read in "USA today" a few days ago,
- >concerning price/performance of new semiconductor technologies:
- >"blah blah, $xxxxx/yyy MIPS, which is $xxx/MIP."
- >
- >What on earth is a MIP? "Million Instructions Per." Per WHAT, fergawdzake?
- >
- >Sigh.
-
- Oh, come on. Much as I hate language errors in general, you have to love
- an errnoneous back-formation like MIP. Probably the first people to use
- it did it inadvertently at first, realised their error, then decided to
- use it anyway for the silliness of it.
-
- Have you never said `How many MIPS is it?', treating the word as a
- plural?
- --
- J Scott Peter XXXIII // "Instantiating new solutions in the emerging arena
- scotty@netcom.com // of transcending the de-facto horizons of industry-
- Las Anjealous // standard open paradigms."
-