home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.philosophy.objectivism
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!abell
- From: abell@netcom.com (Steven T. Abell)
- Subject: Re: God doesn't exist
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.101937.18534@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
- References: <ked-240193222625@m248-104.bgsu.edu> <C1E910.Izv@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 10:19:37 GMT
- Lines: 32
-
- gambit@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu () writes:
- >ked@2001.bgsu.edu (Burly) writes:
- >>Thomas Aquinas, a most influential Roman Catholic theologian and
- >>philosopher came up with the First Cause Argument also known as the
- >>Cosmological Argument. In it he stated several arguments that he believed
- >>make it clear that God does exist. Let's study his argument for a minute:
- >> 1. Everything that exists had a cause of its coming into existence
- >> 2. Nothing can be the cause of itself
- >> 3. There cannot be an infinite series of causal chains
- >> 4. Therefore, there must be a first cause
- >> 5. The First Cause must be God
- >>-----------------------]
- >> 6. Therefore, God exists.
-
- >Actually, Aquinas is correct on his first four counts.
-
- No, he wasn't. The first three are flagrantly contradictory:
-
- Assume God exists. I know, it's hard, but try.
- By (1), God had a cause for coming into existence.
- By (2), this cause was something other than God.
- By (3), this causal chain must stop somewhere.
-
- Fine. Rescale, and call the chain terminator God.
- By (1), God had a cause for coming into existence.
- By (2), this cause was something other than God.
- SPROING!!!
-
- Sorry folks, but words either have meanings or they don't.
- The word "God" doesn't.
-
- Steve abell@netcom.com
-