home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!ucla-cs!ucla-mic!unixg.ubc.ca!ramsay
- From: ramsay@math.ubc.ca (Keith Ramsay)
- Newsgroups: alt.philosophy.objectivism
- Subject: Re: An Observation
- Date: 24 Jan 1993 00:49:28 GMT
- Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
- Lines: 18
- Message-ID: <1jsp2oINNsoa@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>
- References: <leb.727221464@edgar> <C10oz7.19G@newcastle.ac.uk> <1993Jan22.121827.18170@genie.slhs.udel.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: galois.math.ubc.ca
- Keywords: Ethical Problems,Marginal Problems
-
- In article <C10oz7.19G@newcastle.ac.uk> Chris.Holt@newcastle.ac.uk
- (Chris Holt) writes:
- | There is a clear implication that there would be less unemployment
- | less squalor, and less crime under a more laissez-faire government.
-
- I would like very much to know for sure whether this is true.
-
- In article <1993Jan22.121827.18170@genie.slhs.udel.edu>
- starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu (Tim Starr) writes:
- |[...] I can think of two
- |standards of proof for the implication in question: historical case studies,
- |and deduction from the action axiom of Ludwig von Mises.
-
- Perhaps you could describe for us this deduction, and/or give
- reference(s)?
-
- Keith Ramsay "Being a computer means not having
- ramsay@math.ubc.ca to say you're sorry."
-