home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.philosophy.objectivism
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watmath!undergrad.math.waterloo.edu!cantor.math.uwaterloo.ca!svanegmo
- From: svanegmo@cantor.math.uwaterloo.ca (Stephen Van Egmond)
- Subject: Re: Evidence for the market
- Message-ID: <C1KuzD.CpD@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>
- Sender: news@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <C1AMsv.G6K@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> <1993Jan23.210811.1399@netcom.com> <C1Ft7t.Gn6@acsu.buffalo.edu> <1993Jan26.185439.5786@netcom.com> <C1HuL7.2uD@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:49:59 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- What I meant by "public good" is not "a good used by the public at large". The
- textbook I was referring to was a good that would not be provided by the public at
- large, because the marginal cost of adding one extra customer is virually zero.
- This means constantly decreasing average total costs (which, for normal goods,
- increases beyond a given point). The upshot of all this is that nobody will
- subscribe to this, because they anticipate that their neighbour will do so.
-
- This is not meaningless socialist dribble. It is human nature. I think
- that laissez-faire is the best system on earth for allowing (man|woman)kind
- to reach their goals and realize their dreams by exercising their intellect
- and drive. I don't especially _like_ the notion that there are some services
- that must be provided by the government because the free market cannot (or will
- not, in the long run). However, I find the justification for such government-
- provided services logical, and therefore I accept it.
-
- ,,,
- (o o)
- +------------------------------------------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---+
- | Stephen Van Egmond (Power Station) svanegmond@descartes.uwaterloo.ca
- | "Let's make sure history never forgets the name 'Enterprise'."
- | - Picard, "Yesterday's Enterprise"
-
-