home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.fashion
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!fuug!anon
- From: an6791@anon.penet.fi (Living in the shadows)
- Subject: Re: Misc ...
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.060158.10298@fuug.fi>
- Sender: anon@fuug.fi (The Anon Administrator)
- Organization: Anonymous contact service
- X-Anonymously-To: alt.fashion
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 05:57:01 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- >Andrew writes
- >
- >> [silk hose, presumably in suntan or nude] ... As a male, I find them
- >> very attractive on a nicely figured lady ...
- >
- >in reply to,
- >
- >>> The only reason I don't wear "NORMAL" nylons is that they are plain
- >>> ugly. Who ever heard of "suntan" legs in winter or of "nude" that
- >>> does not match your face tone?
- >
- >As a male, I find ``nicely figured'' women attractive no matter what
- >they wear (though, as an aside, I only find ``ladies'' attractive in
- >an uninteresting sort of way). Suntan panty-hose can add to the
- >attraction.
- >
- >But I primarily agree with the sentiment of the first post. The point
- >is that ``normal'' hose (or stockings) are less attractive or more
- >ugly than the colored and/or patterned hose that ``everyone'' is
- >actually waring. The difference depends, primarily on rather the
- >women wearing the hose is attractive or ugly ...
-
- I disagree. A good pair of pantyhose will ALWAYS look good ... as long
- as you have a pair that isn't cheap looking and doesn't have any runs,
- the hose is quite attractive. The challenge is finding hosiery that will
- look nice AND last reasonably well...
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
- Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
- and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
-