home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:14023 talk.politics.misc:70132
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!cs.uiuc.edu!sparc0b!anderson
- From: anderson@cs.uiuc.edu (Andy Anderson)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: Re: The hidden costs of Environmentalism : A case study
- Keywords: r-12, cars, big bucks
- Message-ID: <C1J2EF.Kso@cs.uiuc.edu>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 19:35:02 GMT
- References: <C1Hs2M.3DH@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan27.040332.20699@midway.uchicago.edu> <C1ILo2.Mwn@news.rich.bnr.ca>
- Sender: news@cs.uiuc.edu
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Lines: 17
-
- In <C1ILo2.Mwn@news.rich.bnr.ca> gaj@n8ppd300.DOMAIN.NOT.SET (Gerald A. Josephson) writes:
-
-
- >In article (Ted Frank) writes:
-
- >|>Except it was never a $6 job. It was $6 for the can, and $200+ for the
- >|>environmental damage. Just because you didn't have to directly pay for the
-
- >Where do you get the $200 figure? I was unaware that some company produced the
- >ozone layer and charged everyone for it, or is this another of those instant
- >numbers that get thrown around and we are expected to accept as fact?
-
- Yup, just like TF's "ten thousand generations" of increased cancer risks figure.
-
- >gaj
-
- Andy
-