home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!uwm.edu!usenet
- From: rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.pern
- Subject: Vulnerability
- Date: 23 Jan 1993 11:06:28 GMT
- Organization: Just me.
- Lines: 18
- Message-ID: <1jr8rkINNbhg@uwm.edu>
- References: <1993Jan22.232709.4551@wvnvms.wvnet.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.2.33
- Summary: I was thinking exactly the same thing. Must be empathy.
-
- wolfe@wvnvms.wvnet.edu writes:
- > To be quite honest, in general, despite apperances, Males are
- > far more emotional then famales, which is why they build elaborate
- > defences, and can at time seem insensitive. But perhaps this is
- > a discussion for another time and place. :)
- >
-
- I had the exact same thought a couple days ago, while driving...
-
- I thought, "If women are so emotionaly sensitive, why don't most of them
- hide behind masks of invulnerability like most men do?"
-
- If you ask me, women are the Storm Troopers of emotional warfare.
-
- (Note that I can say this objectively as I haven't been dumped on, lately.)
-
- Rick Miller <rick@ee.uwm.edu> | <rick@discus.mil.wi.us> Ricxjo Muelisto
- Occupation: Husband, Father, WEPCo. WAN Mgr., Discus Sys0p, and Linux fan
-