home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!uotcsi2!news
- From: misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel)
- Subject: Watson's intelligence
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.035507.22209@csi.uottawa.ca>
- Sender: news@csi.uottawa.ca
- Nntp-Posting-Host: kaml2
- Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Ottawa
- References: <1993Jan21.024726.5616@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 03:55:07 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1993Jan21.024726.5616@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, clavazzi@nyx.cs.du.edu (The_Doge) writes:
-
- > Q: How about Watson? Was he really a[s] big a fool as he's often made out
- > to be in movies?
- > A: Not even close. The real Watson (as revealed in the Canon) was a
- > solid, dependable, middle-class Englishman. Not overly imaginative, of
- > average intelligence [...]
-
- Below average, I fear. See the last paragraph of Conan Doyle's preface to
- _The Casebook of Sherlock Holmes_, and Holmes's comment on Watson in "The Lion's
- Mane".
-
- Not *quite* as stupid as Nigel Bruce's portrayal, of course. (One of Nigel
- Bruce's favourite jokes was to say in a thick Watson voice: "People sometimes
- ask me if I'm, er, English. Well, the truth is, if I were any more English,
- I couldn't talk!")
-
- And I never guessed the solution to any of the stories before it was
- presented. Did anyone else here manage to do that (if you can even *remember*
- the first time you read the Canon)?
-
- misrael@csi.uottawa.ca Mark Israel
- Sunbeams brightly play, where Fancy's fair pavilion once is pight.
-