home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!news.byu.edu!eff!kadie
- From: kadie@eff.org (Carl M. Kadie)
- Subject: [aus.aarnet] Re: Censorchip on AARNET
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.174726.1697@eff.org>
- Followup-To: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk,aus.aarnet
- Originator: kadie@eff.org
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
- Organization: The Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:47:26 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- [A repost - Carl]
-
- From: mark@coombs.anu.edu.au (Mark)
- Newsgroups: aus.aarnet
- Subject: Re: Censorchip on AARNET
- Date: 20 Jan 93 23:14:59 GMT
- Message-ID: <mark.727571699@coombs>
-
- tcl@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au (Charles Layton ) writes:
- >carol@ee.uts.edu.au (Carol Gibson) writes:
-
- >>What I want to know is - who banned alt.sexual.abuse.recovery?
- >>(Apparently it got lumped in with all the other alt.sex newsgroups -
- >>which is an entireley inappropriate generalisation). Who does one
- >>have to lobby to get this ban revoked?
-
- >It seems to me that the best way to solve the recurrent requests for
- >various banned newsgroups is to for some site to import them independant
- >of the current link. If the GIF groups were not included this could
- >be done for a relatively small cost. All that is needed is
- > (1) a site to do it
- > (2) a small contribution from everyone who has expressed a desire
- > for one of these groups
- > (3) organisation - probably the hardest bit.
-
- Slight problem in that they arent allowed to be carried on internal AARNET
- links either.
-
- Mark
- mark@coombs.anu.edu.au
- --
- Carl Kadie -- I do not represent EFF; this is just me.
- =kadie@eff.org, kadie@cs.uiuc.edu =
-