home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!hyperion!desire.wright.edu!sbishop
- From: sbishop@desire.wright.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.child-support
- Subject: Re: Itemized accounting of child supportd
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.125602.6711@desire.wright.edu>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 12:56:02 EST
- References: <1h0k4aINN32a@gap.caltech.edu> <20720207@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> <1993Jan20.064524.6668@desire.wright.edu> <1993Jan21.023659.10149@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Organization: Wright State University
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1993Jan21.023659.10149@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, garrod@dynamo.ecn.purdue.edu (David Garrod) writes:
- > In article <1993Jan20.064524.6668@desire.wright.edu>, sbishop@desire.wright.edu writes:
- >> In article <20720207@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM>, laszlo@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Laszlo Nobi) writes:
- >> > In alt.child-support, sbishop@desire.wright.edu writes:
- >> >
- >> >>
- >> >> Ohio's support seems quite reasonable to me. It's based on both parents'
- >> >> income, does not exceed 20% of the total of both. So if each is 50% of
- >> >> the entire total, each only contribute 10%.
- >> >>
- > Couldn`t let this one slip by again.
- >
- >
- > Tricky one here! Sure it`s true each parent only contributes 10%
- > of the total income. But each parent in your example only receives
- > half of the total income. Each contribution is STILL 20% of their
- > own income for one child.
- >
- > David Garrod
-
- The chart I posted was for use for sole custody. In the case I am involved
- in, the custody is with neither parent. Also since one parent is disabled
- (mentally) and on Public Assistance, the contribution is assessed wholey
- on the other parent.
-
- I don't know if there is a different chart for shared custody.
-
- Sue
-