home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.censorship:10086 alt.feminism:7534
- Newsgroups: alt.censorship,alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!farthing
- From: farthing@leland.Stanford.EDU (ljf)
- Subject: Re: soc.feminism editorial policy
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.034312.23498@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
- Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
- References: <1993Jan19.104019.359@newstand.syr.edu> <C14wGD.AJF@panix.com> <1993Jan21.021423.26298@newstand.syr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 03:43:12 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1993Jan21.021423.26298@newstand.syr.edu> greeny@top.cis.syr.edu (J. S. Greenfield) writes:
- >In article <C14wGD.AJF@panix.com> gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch) writes:
- >
- >>| Follow-ups to alt.censorship, since it seems appropriate at this point...
- >>
- >>I don't think that's a good idea at all, if we're discussing
- >>whether or not newsgroup moderation is censorship. First of
- >>all, the discussion arose out of a dispute about the
- >>moderation policy in soc.feminism. We can't conveniently
- >>cross-post to soc.feminism, but alt.feminism serves as a
- >>kind of soc.feminism.d, so it will do. I'd like also to
- >>cross-post to some other groups where this sort of question
- >>has come up before, often with a lot of conflict, but maybe
- >>we need to boil down the issues a bit first.
- >
- >Given that nobody else seems to be contributing to the discussion,
- >and that it has essentially turned into a general discussion of
- >censorship--not soc.feminism, I don't really see the point...
-
- I'm following this in alt.feminism, so I for one appreciate it staying
- in alt.feminism. Also, since this started as a discussion of the
- "censorship" in soc.feminism (and is still touching on that), it
- belongs in alt.feminism.
-
-
