home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!sgigate!odin!fido!solntze.wpd.sgi.com!livesey
- From: livesey@solntze.wpd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey)
- Newsgroups: alt.atheism
- Subject: Re: A point well missed ...
- Message-ID: <1k5e2jINNc6s@fido.asd.sgi.com>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 07:36:51 GMT
- References: <C1G7ry.HKw@darkside.osrhe.uoknor.edu>
- Organization: sgi
- Lines: 14
- NNTP-Posting-Host: solntze.wpd.sgi.com
-
- In article <C1G7ry.HKw@darkside.osrhe.uoknor.edu>, bil@okcforum.osrhe.uoknor.edu (Bill Conner) writes:
- |> The question, "How much should I read of a religions corpus of sacred
- |> writings", seems to miss the point. Being atheists it's incumbent on
- |> you to demonstrate the reasons for your disbelief. Merely attacking
- |> the beliefs of others does nothing to validate your own. Tell me then,
- |> why are you an atheist ...
-
- My disbelief in what, exactly? Your particular religion? Your
- particular deity?
-
- Why don't you tell us why you don't believe in the others. Or
- do you believe in them all?
-
- jon.
-