home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.amateur-comp:669 alt.folklore.computers:19378 alt.culture.usenet:1026
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!deccrl!caen!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!wilbur.nas.nasa.gov!eugene
- From: eugene@wilbur.nas.nasa.gov (Eugene N. Miya)
- Newsgroups: alt.amateur-comp,alt.folklore.computers,alt.culture.usenet
- Subject: Re: Input Need for Talk on "Usenet News:The Poor Man's Arpanet"
- Message-ID: <1993Jan27.192404.15495@nas.nasa.gov>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 19:24:04 GMT
- References: <C1EAK3.725@wolves.Durham.NC.US> <1k2a98INNhgf@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> <1993Jan27.000434.28741@nas.nasa.gov>
- Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator)
- Organization: NAS, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
- Lines: 76
-
- >In article <1k2a98INNhgf@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> ronda@ais.org
- >(Ronda Hauben) writes:
- >>ronda@ais.org responding:
- >> But weren't those who had been excluded from the ARPANET both
- >>aware of that exclusion and also interested in having access to
- >>a similar valuable network?
-
- I wrote:
- >No, they had no concept, and to this day, many people don't fully see
- >what something like the ARPAnet meant back then, even the term internet.
- >Your environment tends to color the way you tend look to at computing.
- >Our site decided to drop payment in 1975. It was a stupid decision,
- >but then I was an undergrad. The management could not see the value.
-
- I want to add one thing this this. Our site was one of the very first
- four nodes of the ARPAnet. The ARPAnet is a grand thing of the time.
- You could go across to computers thousands of miles away and run on
- accounts on them, play chess, access supercomputers (if you had access),
- etc. It was a playground for hackers. It was small enough that you could
- "test door knobs" at every site. It was that freedom to do that as a
- teenager which makes computer networking and software in the US so strong.
-
- I realize how fortunate I was because of the relatively closed and huge
- nature of the Internet. The only place I know which retains a degree of
- that atmosphere are certain areas of the computer industry like Xerox PARC,
- DEC's labs and research Center, Apple, etc. (even certain IBM research labs).
-
- I thought for a while it would have been neat to package a mini-ARPAnet as
- a distributed systems learning tool. It would be a test bed for teaching
- networks, computer security (I've a paper on this I might publish it), and
- other aspects. I think there is too much fear out there. I think a student
- should have access to a system which they can totally trash in safety
- (and not). We learn by making errors.
-
- >Attempts to duplicate the ARPAnet either commercially or in other countries
- >have failed to live up to the same degree as the net.
- >
- >The ARPAnet was funded, designed, and built by truly visionary men (mostly).
- >
- >Exclusion is not the right word. Most people were still using punch cards
- >in those days.
-
- Computer science Departments were in their infancy at the time. The typical
- battle was between control by the mathematics departments and the EE depts.
- CS is neither. The mathematicians (I was one) have no idea how to manage a
- CS Dept. Even the mighty Knuth wrote abut the differences (also saw the
- talk). I think CS departments founded by indifferent math depts are a
- waste. The EE people don't understand software. The world is all perfectly
- logical (almost as bad as the physicists). BTW: this was all done for
- $$, and departmental power. A lot of people did not like and still do not
- like computer science and computers. Turing never described the ARPAnet,
- networks were not seen as computing, it was EE, an extension of telephony.
-
- >It's like trying to describe Berkeley job control to a VMS user or an
- >MS/DOS user (why would you want the thing?) or the first mice and windowing
- >systems to people with vt100s and IBM 3270s. FTP and telnet are two
- >programs which changed my life (as did Alto Star Trek).
-
- What you have to do is understand that you are always in a constant state
- of igorance. That there exists something out there, you aren't going
- to understand (love, freedom, technology, etc.) You have to have a critical
- eye, an open by skeptical and at the same time encouraging perspective.
- It was the people who didn't understand that we need to leave behind.
-
- --eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@orville.nas.nasa.gov
- Associate Editor, Software and Publication Reviews
- Scientific Programming
- {uunet,mailrus,other gateways}!ames!eugene
- Seeking Books to buy: Bongard, Pattern Recognition
- 3 down 1 to go.
-
- --eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@orville.nas.nasa.gov
- Resident Cynic, Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers
- {uunet,mailrus,other gateways}!ames!eugene
- Second Favorite email message: Returned mail: Cannot send message for 3 days
- A Ref: Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, vol. 1, G. Polya
-