home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.environment
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ncar!vexcel!dean
- From: dean@vexcel.com (Dean Alaska)
- Subject: Re: A new outlook on activism.
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.230553.12066@vexcel.com>
- Organization: VEXCEL Corporation, Boulder CO
- References: <168CE12C5C.DRPORTER@SUVM.SYR.EDU> <1993Jan4.165029.5007@vexcel.com> <16B4DED0F.DRPORTER@SUVM.SYR.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 23:05:53 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- In article <16B4DED0F.DRPORTER@SUVM.SYR.EDU> DRPORTER@SUVM.SYR.EDU (Brad Porter) writes:
- >
- >If you were to call a large newspaper and say: There's going to be an
- >illegal timer cut at this place at this time, what are the chances they
- >aren't going to respond. The media loves this kind of stuff. Physical
- >blockading won't be nearly as effective as reporters and maybe cameras
- >taping everything. There are easier ways and more effective ways of
- >accomplishing the same goals. It seems, however, that some people need
- >to get their own name in the paper though these actions. It looks
- >bad in this rather environmentally aware society. Which is more important -
- >stopping the timber cut, or proving how dedicated one is to the cause?
- >All to often the answer is the latter.
- > -Brad Porter
-
- Newspapers in small lumber towns won't care about the cut, most likely.
- If there is a protest, they will most likely cover it, but not without
- the protest. Of course, this isn't true of the LA Times, but there
- aren't too many illegal cuts in Los Angeles. Many of such protests
- actually serve the purpose of saving the trees since the cut will be
- stopped whenever the glacial legal processes can be brought to fore.
- If the blockade succeeds in stopping the timber cut, then how can
- one tell whether proving dedication is the main cause?
-
- I think
- your main point is that its better to work with people rather than
- against them, and I agree with this. But it only works when there
- is some form of consensus about the general goals and the debate
- is about facts or methods that can be analysed. If I value
- biodiversity highly and someone else thinks keeping their job for
- a few more years is worth more than the existence of a species,
- finding common ground can be difficult.
- --
- ==============================================================================
- Dean Myerson dean@vexcel.com
- ==============================================================================
-