home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:55175 alt.abortion.inequity:6401
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!cos!cos!bob1
- From: bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw)
- Subject: Re: Basis for Roe Decision
- Message-ID: <bob1.726775467@cos>
- Organization: Corporation for Open Systems
- References: <1992Dec23.171241.7353@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Dec29.182641.22268@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan6.060819.22850@midway.uchicago.edu> <1993Jan7.024809.22609@ncsu.edu> <bob1.726507766@cos> <1ir2sqINNgio@gap.caltech.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 18:04:27 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In <1ir2sqINNgio@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
-
- >bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
-
- >>Now, there is no law that says that I (as a man) cannot elect to
- >>have a fully functional kidney removed, assuming I can find a
- >>surgeon willing to perform the operation. I imagine I would have
- >>about the same chance as a snowball in hell.
-
- >Poor example. Such "removals" are not infrequently performed for
- >kidney donations.
-
- OK, try liver then. Yes please, I'll have mine with fried onions.
-
- >--
-
- > -- Michal
- >----------------------------------------------------------------------
- >Of course there's no reason!
-
- REB
-