home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: Blackmun calls the Roe v. Wade dividing line ""arbitrary""
- Message-ID: <1993Jan10.042730.15854@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <markp.725742291@dragonfly.wri.com> <1993Jan9.075154.10306@netcom.com> <markp.726627079@spider.wri.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 04:27:30 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <markp.726627079@spider.wri.com> markp@spider.wri.com (Mark Pundurs) writes:
- >In <1993Jan9.075154.10306@netcom.com> ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
- >
- >>markp@dragonfly.wri.com (Mark Pundurs) writes ...
- >>>In <30DEC92.17224243@vax.clarku.edu> hsims@vax.clarku.edu writes:
- >>>>Once again, consent to sex, with or without using brains, does not equal
- >>>>consent to nine months of pregnancy.
- >>>
- >>>Having sex = Chancing the possibility of pregnancy. (Simple biological
- >>>fact.) Therfore: Consent to sex = consent to chance of pregnancy.
- >
- >>Driving = Chancing the possibility of dying. (Simple biological
- >>fact.) Therefore: Consent to driving = consent to dying.
- >
- >Try again, Ray. Simple substitution (sex -> driving, pregnancy -> death)
- >shows the parallel conclusion to be
- >
- >Consent to driving = consent to cahnce of death
-
- Okay, Mark, let's say for the sake of argument that consent to sex IS
- consent to becoming pregnant. Now, please explain to me why it's
- consent to STAY pregnant for a full 9 months...
-
- - Kevin
-