home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:54947 talk.religion.misc:25704 alt.atheism:25543
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc,alt.atheism
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!rock!taco!eceyv.ncsu.edu!dsh
- From: dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Subject: Re: Christian Pro-Choicers
- Message-ID: <1993Jan10.012253.23150@ncsu.edu>
- Followup-To: talk.abortion
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- References: <1993Jan9.074243.9436@netcom.com> <1993Jan9.163519.5896@ncsu.edu> <1993Jan10.000056.9355@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 01:22:53 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1993Jan10.000056.9355@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-
- >> The Freedom of Choice Act, [..] contains no conscience clause
- >> which would protect hospital employees from facing punishment for
- >> refusing to assist in an abortion procedure.
-
- > No such clause is needed. If you don't want to assist in abortions,
- > don't work in an abortion clinic.
-
- I mentioned *hospital* employees, not abortion clinic employees.
-
- > Further, this issue is
- > addressed by both medical ethics and hopsital policy.
-
- Medical ethics is an oxymoron with regards to abortion.
-
-