home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!gordons
- From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
- Subject: Re: An argument for better sex ed
- Message-ID: <1993Jan10.004632.17418@netcom.com>
- Organization: Gizmonic Institute - Home of the "Big G Burger"
- References: <1993Jan8.175341.7057@coopsol.com> <1993Jan9.073419.21882@noao.edu>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 00:46:32 GMT
- Lines: 73
-
- <1993Jan9.073419.21882@noao.edu> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) :
- >From article by gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga):
- >> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) said:
- >>>From article by patrick@rio-grande.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey):
- >>>> Is that so? I've been here as long as you have, and strangely enough, I
- >>>> haven't seen any such activity --
- >>>
- >>>We all know you're blind as a bat. Just look at what you married.
- >>
- >> Crude, Suzanne. Have you ever "looked" at Patrick's wife?
- >
- >Of course not - that was the point. None of us have, which renders
- >the statement absurd. Even if nobody else appreciates it, _I_ had a good
- >laugh! :-) Notice I never actually insulted his wife.
-
- I have no doubt you had a good laugh. As for denying your insulting
- intention... well, I'm not claiming to read your mind, but it seemed
- pretty clear to me what you were inferring.
-
- >> Are you
- >> implying that she is a lesbian who got herself pregnant by the "teaspoon
- >> method"
- >
- >Never occured to me actually. But a clever twist.
-
- Well, if it was clever I can see why it didn't occur to you.
-
- >>>> Or are you saying you
- >>>> really think Heather got herself pregnant? (That *is* a neat trick, if she
- >>>> really did that.)
- >>>>
- >>>> --PLH, I don't think that's how Dale's daughter got here, though...
- >>>
- >>>Yeah. She ain't yours. She's another man's, a man who's been with your
- >>>wife.
- >>
- >> Are you saying that children are just property that are owned by their
- >> biological parents? Are you saying that people who adopt are never really
- >> the parents of the child and should not be respected as such?
- >
- >Not at all.
-
- But you are saying that his wife's daughter belongs to another man
- apparently because Patrick is not the biological father.
-
- >>> I hope it drives you crazy.
- >>
- >> How loving. How Christian. You actually hope that a man who marries a
- >> divorced woman would be driven crazy by memories of her ex-husband. Is
- >> this what your "real" Christianity teaches you?
- >
- >I think it pretty silly that so many people are so upset by someone simply
- >exposing the downside of such common life situations nowadays. If it
- >_didn't_ bother Patrick, he wouldn't have a human heart in him. Try
- >reading Hosea.
-
- Try reading what you wrote - You are hoping it drives him crazy. You are
- saying, "Gee, and it probably bothers you too." I wouldn't really care
- about insults except you set yourself up to be this caring Catholic
- Christian yet I see you wishing unhappiness on someone because he can't
- be the father to his wife's daughter. That doesn't sound very caring to
- me. In fact it sounds very hypocritcal of you.
-
-
- Gordon
- Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
- Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), Diana (Sorceress), Beth
- "CJ", and Nadja, and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it.
- [space reserved for alternate ex-girlfriends Eric R. and Drieux]
- --
- The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
- of whatever company you think I work for. So there, thhhbbbt!
- Message to Kodak: Freedom for Dan Bredy.
-