home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #1 / NN_1993_1.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 54917 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-09  |  1.1 KB  |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!wri!spider.wri.com!markp
  3. From: markp@spider.wri.com (Mark Pundurs)
  4. Subject: Re: Questions for Pro-Choice advocates
  5. Message-ID: <markp.726624994@spider.wri.com>
  6. Sender: news@wri.com
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: spider.wri.com
  8. Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
  9. References: <C0Jxtu.L5L@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan8.155810.14110@hemlock.cray.com> <C0K6zE.1wr@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan8.212721.22962@hemlock.cray.com>
  10. Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 00:16:34 GMT
  11. Lines: 14
  12.  
  13. In <1993Jan8.212721.22962@hemlock.cray.com> mon@cray.com (Muriel Nelson) writes:
  14.  
  15. >But how can women approach economic
  16. >parity without reproductive freedom?  Do you not see how
  17. >unequal reproductive rights would hamper women in the
  18. >workplace?
  19.  
  20. Irrelevant. If the z/e/f is not human, or may legitimately evicted from
  21. her mother's womb, then ANY reason is sufficient for an abortion. If
  22. the z/e/f is human, and may not legitimately be evicted, then her
  23. primary right to life outweighs her mother's secondary (because
  24. dependent on the right to life) economic rights.
  25.  
  26. Mark Pundurs
  27.