home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: STS-1 DISASTER/COVERUPy
- Message-ID: <C0G325.FoD@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 18:22:52 GMT
- References: <1992Dec15.205959.2845@cnsvax.uwec.edu> <1992Dec19.090259.2203@ccsvax.sfasu.edu> <18330@bcars664.bnr.ca> <1993Jan5.234659.7819@ee.ubc.ca>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1993Jan5.234659.7819@ee.ubc.ca> davem@ee.ubc.ca (Dave Michelson) writes:
- >>Plus the 747 airframe, crew, and modifications. One could not expect
- >>the carrier aircraft to survive a launch of orbiter from its back.
- >
- >Even the X-15 didn't light its engine until *after* separation from the
- >carrier aircraft.
-
- There are missiles which fly off their launch rails under power, rather
- than delaying ignition until after separation. Admittedly, a delay is
- usually considered safer.
- --
- "God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- -Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-