home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: Let's be more specific (was: Stupid Shut Cost arguements)
- Message-ID: <C0rEIG.tq@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:03:50 GMT
- References: <1993Jan9.030346.9714@ptdcs2.intel.com> <ewright.726733131@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan11.154812.235@ke4zv.uucp> <ewright.726776389@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan12.171525.7437@ke4zv.uucp>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1993Jan12.171525.7437@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes:
- >Even the SR71 uses fuel to help cool it's titanium skin, and it travels
- >more than four times slower than a re-entry vehicle...
-
- However, it does it for a much longer period. I don't claim to be a
- hypersonics guru, but my understanding is that you get *very* different
- design solutions for a "hypersonic accelerator" and a "hypersonic cruiser"
- (where the former is at hypersonic speeds only briefly, accelerating
- towards orbit, and the latter spends much of its operating life there).
-
- The X-20 Dyna-Soar's heat protection was mostly refractory metals, as
- I recall.
-
- >The only practical
- >metal more refractory than titanium is tungsten...
-
- A curious claim. The X-15 used titanium only for its *low temperature*
- structure, and did not use tungsten at all. Most of its hot structure
- was stainless steels of various types. They are heavy, but not impossibly
- so. The B-70's wing and main body was stainless-steel honeycomb.
- --
- "God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- -Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-