home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!network.ucsd.edu!lutherlab.ucsd.edu!rabjab
- From: rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu (rabjab)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: future space travel
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:46:53 GMT
- Organization: ucsd
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <rabjab.11.726799613@golem.ucsd.edu>
- References: <19463@mindlink.bc.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: lutherlab.ucsd.edu
-
- In article <19463@mindlink.bc.ca> Nick_Janow@mindlink.bc.ca (Nick Janow) writes:
-
- >Who needs a gravity well (otherwise known as planet)? The entire solar
- >system could be colonized. All you really need is raw materials and energy,
- >and those exist in convenient packages out in the solar system.
- >Do you have to have a planet under you just because your parents did? Let
- >your imagination roam... :)
-
- While it's fun to let imagination roam, I don't think it necessarily
- follows that all dreams translate into reality.
-
- Imagineers (Gerard O'Neill, Robert Forward, and many others), can create
- an interesting universe on paper, but I wonder which of their musings
- will come to pass. I don't question their expertise in matters related to
- physical law and engineering practice. However, I do question the stated
- economics of the plans of an Imagineer.
-
- The Imagineer is a salesman, and as such, underestimates costs for projects.
- And because the dreams of an Imagineer cost billions of dollars to even
- start, he has to involve himself and others in the political process, that
- grand arena of diminished truthfulness.
-
- -rabjab
-
-