home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!gatech!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
- From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
- Subject: Re: Should NASA operate shuttles (was Re: Shuttle a research tool)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan10.162427.24494@ke4zv.uucp>
- Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
- Organization: Destructive Testing Systems
- References: <1993Jan7.161638.6125@cerberus.ulaval.ca> <1993Jan7.180422.3473@iti.org> <1993Jan7.220739.9367@cerberus.ulaval.ca> <1993Jan8.134508.15155@iti.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 16:24:27 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1993Jan8.134508.15155@iti.org> aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan7.220739.9367@cerberus.ulaval.ca> yergeau@phy.ulaval.ca (Francois Yergeau) writes:
- >
- >>>So what is so special about human space flight?
- >
- >>The market, for one thing. Spin off shuttle to the private sector, and
- >>you're likely to get at most one provider, and one buyer (NASA).
- >
- >Nonsense. Run KSC like an airport and Shuttle like an airliner. There is
- >no reason that several companies couldn't buy Shuttles and lease the
- >hanger facilities like any other airport.
- >
- >The market is small because NASA keeps it small.
-
- The market is small because there's little industrial demand outside
- of comsats for access to space. No product other than communications
- has shown itself economic in the face of the high up front costs of
- entry. Commercial launcher providers are cheaper than NASA, as you are
- fond of noting, and NASA has been restricted in competing for commercial
- launch business. So NASA isn't keeping the space market small. The lack
- of a way to turn a buck is keeping the market small.
-
- Gary
- --
- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
- Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
- 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
- Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | emory!ke4zv!gary@gatech.edu
-