home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: Supporting private space activities
- Message-ID: <C0M93s.9u7@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 02:19:03 GMT
- References: <C0K4xF.Fvo.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <C0K4xF.Fvo.1@cs.cmu.edu> dep+@CS.CMU.EDU (David Pugh) writes:
- >The federal government paid the early airlines to carry mail. In some (most?)
- >cases, these mail subsidies were the only thing that made the airlines profitable.
- >So ... it seems reasonable to wonder if a similar program could be done for the
- >private launcher market. What I'm proposing is that the government agree to pay
- >$1000/lbs to deliver 1 million pounds to LEO each year from 1995 to 2015. At
- >$1 billion/year, this would be a fairly small program (by government standards).
-
- Congratulations, you've reinvented (more or less) the Commercial Space
- Incentive Act, which was proposed a few years ago. Congress didn't like it
- and it didn't get anywhere.
-
- Even if you could get it passed, there is the non-trivial problem of
- convincing would-be launcher developers that it won't get repealed during
- their development period. It *is* a relatively small expense, and it
- almost certainly *would* be extremely effective, but it's not the way
- Congress likes to do things.
-
- >... (I realize, of course,
- >that NASA would ever let it pass no matter what we did to it)?
-
- It's not NASA's decision. Congress has passed bills that NASA didn't like.
- Forget NASA; the hard part is selling it to Congress.
- --
- "God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- -Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-