home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU!dep
- From: dep+@CS.CMU.EDU (David Pugh)
- Subject: Supporting private space activities
- Message-ID: <C0K4xF.Fvo.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ius5.ius.cs.cmu.edu
- Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
- Distribution: na
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 22:53:34 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- The federal government paid the early airlines to carry mail. In some (most?)
- cases, these mail subsidies were the only thing that made the airlines profitable.
- So ... it seems reasonable to wonder if a similar program could be done for the
- private launcher market. What I'm proposing is that the government agree to pay
- $1000/lbs to deliver 1 million pounds to LEO each year from 1995 to 2015. At
- $1 billion/year, this would be a fairly small program (by government standards).
-
- Some additional bells and whistles:
- + Payment is on delivery. If your launcher blows up, etc., you don't get
- paid.
-
- + In years where there's less than a million pounds of payload to orbit,
- we make up the difference by shipping water (since a water has a 1001
- uses in orbit). Would it be possible to store the water in a slightly
- modified shuttle external tank? In particular, paint the tank so that
- its ambient temperature is below freezing (that way, leaks aren't as
- much of a problem) and add the plumbing to let you add water even when
- the tank is partially full of ice.
-
- What else needs to be added to make this proposal workable (I realize, of course,
- that NASA would ever let it pass no matter what we did to it)?
-
- --
- ... He was determined to discover the David Pugh
- underlying logic behind the universe. ...!seismo!cmucs!dep
- Which was going to be hard, because
- there wasn't one. _Mort_, Terry Pratchett
-