home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.space:19040 sci.aeronautics:2706
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!engage.pko.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!decwin.enet.dec.com!fisher
- From: fisher@decwin.enet.dec.com
- Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.aeronautics
- Subject: Re: Subjective Safety Measure(Re: man-rating)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan8.192116.28539@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
- Date: 8 Jan 93 19:21:16 GMT
- References: <1993Jan7.152456.25477@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <1993Jan7.181829.13714@cs.ucf.edu> <1993Jan8.173933.12320@ke4zv.uucp>
- Sender: usenet@nntpd.lkg.dec.com (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: fisher@decwin.enet.dec.com ()
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
- Lines: 25
-
-
- It would seem to me that whether probability of exit or deaths per passenger
- mile is a more valid measure would depend on why you want the info.
-
- For example, the airplane vs car comparison probably makes more sense in terms
- of miles, because I interpret the question to be "If I want to travel from
- Boston to Chicago, is it safer to use a car or a plane." Chances are
- that you will exit the car more times between Boston and Chicago than you will
- by plane.
-
- On the other hand, if you are comparing it with the shuttle, the "per mile" is
- specious. The fact that you went 2 million miles to get from LC39 to the
- runway across the island, or the fact that the runway is 2 miles from the pad
- is irrelavent. So in this, I think I would compare entry/exit.
-
- The other interesting part of this is that most airplane fatalities
- (and so far all shuttle fatalities) occur close to entry/exit. In other words
- the length of the trip is unlikely to be significant to the probability of
- fatality. I doubt this is strictly true in cars. While I have heard that most
- accidents happen within 10 miles of home, I suspect that is because most of
- person-miles spent in cars are within 10 miles of home.
-
- Anyway...(why did I get into this discussion!!!!???)
-
- Burns
-