home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: Shuttle a research tool (was: Re: Let's be more specific)
- Message-ID: <C0IBDp.BJ7@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 23:17:47 GMT
- References: <ewright.726345157@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan7.033118.1652@cerberus.ulaval.ca> <C0Hun4.13t@zoo.toronto.edu> <1993Jan7.195658.8028@cerberus.ulaval.ca>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1993Jan7.195658.8028@cerberus.ulaval.ca> yergeau@phy.ulaval.ca (Francois Yergeau) writes:
- >>Actually, it is not at all uncommon for airlines to lease planes complete
- >>with crews,
- >
- >NASA could consider leasing shuttle services if a provider were
- >available; but there's none, and with orbiters at $1.5 billion a pop,
- >plus gigadollar infrastructure, none is likely to appear...
-
- Several *have* appeared. That much money is not all that hard to find;
- Boeing spent more than that (its own money, not borrowed) on the 757/767
- program, and it's small potatoes compared to the (private) investment
- in big electric-power projects. Privately-funded orbiters have been
- proposed repeatedly.
-
- So why hasn't it been done already? Because NASA hates the idea and has
- consistently done its best to obstruct, stall, and kill such proposals.
- --
- "God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- -Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-