home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!fs1.ee.ubc.ca!davem
- From: davem@ee.ubc.ca (Dave Michelson)
- Subject: Re: DC-1 and the $23M NASA Toilet
- Message-ID: <1993Jan8.002029.29209@ee.ubc.ca>
- Organization: University of BC, Electrical Engineering
- References: <schumach.726431013@convex.convex.com> <1ii451INN71d@phantom.gatech.edu> <1iibakINNic6@cbl.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 00:20:29 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1iibakINNic6@cbl.umd.edu> mike@starburst.umd.edu (Michael F. Santangelo) writes:
- >
- >But, let me ask (since I don't know the specifics): how well did the
- >Skylab toilet work and what does the new $23M Shuttle toilet do that
- >the Skylab didn't do?
- >
- >There is also a reference to the Gemini program in this thread, what did
- >they do?
- >
-
- Gemini (and Apollo) used a suction hose to collect urine (which was then
- dumped overboard) and fecal collection bags for "solid matter". Fecal
- collection bags are hard to use in free-fall so they came with a plastic
- glove called the "shit mitt" to help... well, you get the idea. When
- all was said and done, a tablet of bactericide was inserted into the
- bag which was then closed. The astronaut was then required to knead the
- bag to evenly distribute the bactericide amongst the solid matter.
-
- The astronauts like dumping the urine overboard (it froze into tiny
- ice crytals which Schirra dubbed the constellation Urinus) but *hated*
- the fecal collection bags for obvious reasons.
-
-
-
-