home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: launcher costs by type of economy
- Message-ID: <C0G77x.Hx5@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 19:52:44 GMT
- References: <h0l2prg@rpi.edu> <1992Dec16.195416.8422@iti.org> <1992Dec17.163212.20944@eng.umd.edu> <1992Dec22.161111.29439@iti.org> <1992Dec25.002926.4218@ke4zv.uucp> <ewright.725647824@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan4.152349.10512@ke4zv.uucp> <C0CJu8.6sr@zoo.toronto.edu> <1993Jan5.214143.21291@ke4zv.uucp>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1993Jan5.214143.21291@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes:
- >>I agree that, other things being equal (an important precondition!), free
- >>societies are more efficient than command economies. Nobody has yet tried
- >>building a space program on free enterprise.
- >
- >That's because nobody can show a high enough return on investment to
- >interest private capital markets...
-
- That's not actually a prerequisite. I worded my posting carefully. :-)
-
- A fully private space program would have to show a return on investment,
- although just how high, and how soon, depends on who's doing the investing:
- Ross Perot could probably fund his own small space program without having
- to convince anyone but himself that it was a good idea.
-
- However, you can build a space program *on* free enterprise without having
- to find private money to get it started. Government funding *can* be used
- to build free enterprise rather than bypass it. Buy services, not hardware.
- Specify objectives, not methods. Pay for results, not for attempts. Give
- market guarantees, not subsidies.
-
- It worked for aviation.
- --
- "God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- -Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-