home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!helium!corleyj
- From: corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley )
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Gravity & Rubber Sheet Analogy Problem
- Keywords: gravity, general relativity
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.033154.28248@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 03:31:54 GMT
- References: <79814@hydra.gatech.EDU>
- Sender: news@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <79814@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt1057a@prism.gatech.EDU (gt1057a JOHNSTON,KEITH) writes:
- >In almost all explanations of gravity as warped space, the analogy
- >But what if the first mass is Earth, and I set the moon in its
- >depression, with no initial velocity. What would pull it "down"
- >toward the Earth, whicsits at the b bottom? Why wouldn't it
- >just sit there in the depression? Unless there is some other force
- >pushing it down the slope, which would mean an external "gravitational"
- >force outside the rubber-sheet universe, why would it move?
- >
- > Keith J
- Because once you put the Earth down on the sheet, the sheet is no longer
- flat. When you put the Moon down, it makes its own depression, true,
- but that depression is within the first (since gravity acts at infinite
- distance, we should assume both depressions to be infinite in size, but
- this is kind of hard to imagine). What this means is that the Earth
- goes a little bit towards the Moon (because of the smaller depression)
- and the Moon goes a lot towards the Earth. The rubber sheet model is
- pretty neat, but gets harder to visualize the more accurate you make it.
- A lot like most physics, I've found...
- Jason
- Not The Jason At Oxford, But I Had A Good Xmas Anyway
-