home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa1.lbl.gov!sichase
- From: sichase@csa1.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: "SPIN," Micro- vs. Macroscopic . . . .
- Date: 7 Jan 1993 17:09 PST
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
- Lines: 26
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <7JAN199317095262@csa1.lbl.gov>
- References: <93007.141458CCB104@psuvm.psu.edu> <1ii9krINNivt@gap.caltech.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.196
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
-
- In article <1ii9krINNivt@gap.caltech.edu>, allenk@ugcs.caltech.edu (Allen Knutson) writes...
- ><CCB104@psuvm.psu.edu> inquires:
- >
- >>What's the difference between the spin of a globe or
- >>disk (e.g. beachball or frisbee), say, and the spin of an
- >>electron, photon, phonon, Bloch spin wave, proton, etc.?
- >
- >One's quantized and the other isn't (in an infinite universe).
- >Luckily, I can give (part of) a more useful answer.
-
- What makes you say that the spin of a beachball is not quantized? It most
- certainly is, though you will never design a clever enough experiment to
- measure the quantization, given the huge number of spin quanta contained in
- the typical beachball.
-
- Just because QM goes nicely over to classical Newtonian mechanics,
- *on average*, in the appropriate limit, does not mean that quantization
- turns off - merely that it becomes insignificant to the dynamics.
-
- -Scott
- --------------
- Scott I. Chase "It is not a simple life to be a single cell,
- SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV although I have no right to say so, having
- been a single cell so long ago myself that I
- have no memory at all of that stage of my
- life." - Lewis Thomas
-