home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!bnrgate!bcars267!bucknerb
- From: bucknerb@bnr.ca (Brent Buckner)
- Subject: Re: temporally undecided states (was: hidden variables)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.174712.24889@bnr.ca>
- Sender: news@bnr.ca (usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bcars188
- Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ontario, Canada
- References: <1992Dec31.222704.19821@asl.dl.nec.com> <461@mtnmath.UUCP> <1993Jan2.055743.26499@asl.dl.nec.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 17:47:12 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1993Jan2.055743.26499@asl.dl.nec.com> terry@asl.dl.nec.com writes:
- >This reminds me of a promise I made a long time ago to post an oddball way
- >of interpreting such QM "timing" issues. So why not give it now?
- >
- >
- > TIME --> _ - (1st detection)
- > _ - / (past "created")
- > (pair production)- _ <-----------------'
- > - _---------------------------.
- > - _ (past unfolds | "locally")
- > - _ V
- > - (2nd detection)
- >
- >
- >REFERENCES, PLEASE?
- >
-
- "The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" by
- John Cramer in Reviews of Modern Physics, July 1986
-
- --
- at Bell-Northern Research
- voice: (613) 765-2739
- Canada Post: P.O. Box 3511, Station C, Ottawa, Canada, K1Y 4H7
- I do not claim that BNR holds these views.
-