home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.noc.drexel.edu!coe.drexel.edu!n1-24-215-coe-abbotts.coe.drexel.edu!chaas
- From: chaas@coe.drexel.edu (Chuck Haas)
- Newsgroups: sci.math.stat
- Subject: Nonrandom Random Numbers?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.132319.6437@cbis.ece.drexel.edu>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 13:23:19 GMT
- Sender: news@cbis.ece.drexel.edu
- Organization: Drexel University
- Lines: 16
- X-Xxmessage-Id: <A77831AA8C0118D7@n1-24-215-coe-abbotts.coe.drexel.edu>
- X-Xxdate: Tue, 12 Jan 93 00:28:26 GMT
- X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d17
-
- There was an article in today's (1/12/93) New York Times (page 1, section
- C) about some IBM researchers who found deficiencies in "standard" random
- number generators when using some crystallographic type of test. Anyone
- on the net who would care to add details? What generators (I presume one
- of the linear congruential ones); but did these also include the
- shuffling algorithm advocated in Numerical Recipes?
-
-
-
-
-
- Charles N. Haas
- Professor, Environmental Engineering
- Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104
- ======================================
- CHaas@COE.Drexel.Edu
-