home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:17966 sci.philosophy.tech:4735
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.philosophy.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!chx400!news.unige.ch!divsun.unige.ch!swann
- From: swann@divsun.unige.ch (SWANN philip)
- Subject: Re: Numbers and sets
- Message-ID: <1993Jan11.142458.3772@news.unige.ch>
- Sender: usenet@news.unige.ch
- Organization: University of Geneva, Switzerland
- References: <Bzosz1.FMx@cantua.canterbury.ac.nz> <1992Dec23.175145.18528@guinness.idbsu.edu> <1992Dec27.035413.18857@husc3.harvard.edu> <1ioee8INN9sc@bang.hal.COM>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 14:24:58 GMT
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <1ioee8INN9sc@bang.hal.COM>, landman@hal.COM (Howard Landman) writes:
-
- >
- > Or is MZ using "analytically true" to mean something which might not be
- > "true" in the normal sense?
-
- No, he's just trying to motivate or justify technical choices by appeal to
- an unspecified version of an irrelevant and worn-out philosophical doctrine...
-