home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watmath!graceland.uwaterloo.ca!shallit
- From: shallit@graceland.uwaterloo.ca (Jeffrey Shallit)
- Subject: Lunde's problem (least number with n divisors)
- Message-ID: <C0BzI1.MIu@math.uwaterloo.ca>
- Keywords: unique factors
- Sender: news@math.uwaterloo.ca (News Owner)
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <1993Jan3.003521.26610@tessi.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 13:15:37 GMT
- Lines: 48
-
- In article <1993Jan3.003521.26610@tessi.com> ronl@tessi.com (Ron Lunde) writes:
- >I'm not a mathematician, so I'd appreciate it if anyone could point me to
- >any references on this topic (that I might be able to understand :-)).
- >
- >The question I was toying with last night was: Given a number N,
- >what is the smallest number M such that aside from 1 and M, M has exactly
- >N unique factors (I guess I'm probably using "factor" in a funny way here,
- >since I'm not referring to primes, necessarily). Obviously there *is* such
- >a number, since we can construct at least one by multiplying the first N
- >primes. It seems odd that the first ones are all fairly small, but I can't
- >find the 15th (at least nothing smaller than 614889782588491410):
- >
- >N Divisors Smallest M Factors
- >2 6 2, 3
- >3 16 2, 4, 8
- >4 12 2, 3, 4, 6
- >5 64 2, 4, 8, 16, 32
- >6 24 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12
- >7 36 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18
- >8 48 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24
- >9 1024 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512
- >10 60 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30
- >11 4096 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048
- >12 192 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96
- >13 144 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72
- >14 120 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 24, 30, 40, 60
- >
- >Anyone know about this?
- >Thanks!
- >
- >Ron Lunde
- >email: ronl@tessi.com
-
- Basically, you're looking for the smallest integer M with n positive *divisors*
- (although most mathematicians would include 1 and M in the enumeration).
-
- This problem has not been extensively studied, to my knowledge. The sequence
- is #A5179 in the new version of Sloane's book (which has yet to appear). The
- only reference I know is Beiler, Recreations in the Theory of Numbers, pp. 7-8.
- Beiler also sketches an algorithm that will find such numbers. To the best
- of my knowledge, it is not known how to produce the prime factorization of
- the solution in polynomial time (in log n, of course). It is clearly impossible,
- in general, to produce the (say base-10) expansion of the solution in polynomial
- time in log n, since in general it could have Theta(n) digits.
-
- The least number with 17 divisors (or 15, using your definition) is 2^16.
-
- Jeff Shallit
-