home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!wrldlnk!usenet
- From: "Michael Smith" <p00004@psilink.com>
- Subject: Re: Education and the Environment by Gregory A. Smith
- In-Reply-To: <726211292snx@tillage.DIALix.oz.au>
- Message-ID: <2935440099.0.p00004@psilink.com>
- Sender: usenet@worldlink.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
- Organization: Performance Systems Int'l
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 00:24:18 GMT
- X-Mailer: PSILink-DOS (3.3)
- Lines: 35
-
- >DATE: Tue, 05 Jan 93 05:21:32 GMT
- >FROM: Gil Hardwick <gil@tillage.DIALix.oz.au>
- .[....] The
- >etymology of the word "education" arises from "to the Duke".
- > ^^^ ^^^^
-
- Oh dear. Philology, it seems, has as many pitfalls for the unwary as
- ethnology.
-
- The verb "educare", with essentially its modern sense, existed in the
- very earliest Latin. It is, of course, derived from the verb "ducere",
- meaning "to lead", and the preposition "e(x)" meaning "out" or "away"
- or, sometimes, something like "up". "Duke", naturally, is not a Latin
- word but is derived from the Latin "dux", a leader, and ultimately
- from the same verb stem (representing Indo-European *deuk-). So "duke"
- and "educate" are not grandparent and grandchild, but very distant
- cousins. Of the two, "educate" is the older.
-
- In fact, "educate" is not just a special concrete sense of "lead out":
- Latinists will have noticed that it is a first-conjugation verb, while
- the ultimate etymon, ducere, is third-conjugation; and *real* Latinists
- will also know that the 'u' in educere is long (representing the "full
- e-grade" of the Indo-European root), while the 'u' in "educare" is short
- (representing the "zero-grade" of the root). Thus the coinage
- represented by "educate" is in fact extremely archaic -- pre-Latin or
- Proto-Italic. The two would have seemed as different to speakers of
- Classical Latin as, say, "tug" and "tow" in Modern English, which also,
- as it happens, represent outcomes of the full e-grade and zero-grade
- of the same Indo-European root, *deuk-.
-
- The argumentum etymologicum is always, I think, rather feeble, but
- particularly so when the etymology is a "howler".
-
- --Michael Smith
-
-