home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!udel!darwin.sura.net!tulane!uflorida!jfh
- From: jfh@beach.cis.ufl.edu (James F. Hranicky)
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Subject: Re: GM Plant Closures and Economic Problems
- Message-ID: <38173@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu>
- Date: 7 Jan 93 22:41:36 GMT
- References: <1992Dec26.160846.8549@Princeton.EDU> <38089@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu> <58128@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu
- Organization: Univ. of Florida CIS Dept.
- Lines: 27
- Nntp-Posting-Host: beach.cis.ufl.edu
-
- In article <58128@dime.cs.umass.edu> yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken) writes:
-
- >>Let's here it for the Fed--our dollar has lost >95% of its purchasing
- >>power since then. Hooray.
- >
- >How do you account for the numerous boom/bust cycles that predated
- >the Federal reserve?
- >
-
- You can attribute these to the National Banking Act of 1860. This
- legislation centralized reserves in a few banks in NYC, creating a
- quasi-central bank. These banks could then influence the money supply
- much greater than would have been possible had true free competition
- had been in place.
-
- I believe one of the most stable banking experiments in history was
- the Scottish free banking system--there were no legal tender laws, no
- reserve requirements, no government monopoly on the money supply.
- A very sound banking system was established, much to the envy of the
- neighboring British, and it was based on a de facto gold standard. It
- finally crumbled after legislation was passed regulating the industry,
- I believe.
-
- Jim Hranicky (jfh@reef.cis.ufl.edu)
-
-
-
-