home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: ericb@hplsla.hp.com (Eric Backus)
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 19:13:59 GMT
- Subject: Re: Privacy -- encrypt/decrypt devices on Wireless phones
- Message-ID: <5830011@hplsla.hp.com>
- Organization: HP Lake Stevens, WA
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!hp-cv!hp-pcd!hplsla!ericb
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- References: <1hpsm7INNp2i@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- Lines: 28
-
- > Patrick W. P. Dirks writes:
- >
- > As other posters have pointed out, monitoring cordless phone links is *NOT*
- > illegal in the US. I believe monitoring cellular phone calls is not
- > against the law, either, except that you cannot disclose the contents of
- > anything you monitor or use it for your own gain. Congress recently passed
- > a bill that prohibits the sale of scanners that can receive (or be "easily
- > modified to receive") the 800 MHz cellular band. That doesn't make
- > listening illegal, however, and doesn't remove existing scanners from the
- > market.
-
- You are correct that it is legal to monitor cordless phones in the US.
- You may not disclose what you hear or use it for gain, which is true
- of most things that you can legally monitor in the US.
-
- However, it is not legal to even monitor cellular phone calls. The
- cellular phone people asked for and received a special rule for
- cellular phones. Older scanners picked up the 800 MHz band. I've
- heard rumors that some newer scanners can be easily modified (by
- removing a jumper or something) to again receive the 800 MHz band.
-
- > The real lesson, I'm afraid, is: don't expect *ANY* privacy on cordless or
- > cellular phones. You stand a good chance of being disappointed if you do.
-
- This is of course still true.
- --
- Eric Backus
- ericb@lsid.hp.com
-