home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!sprite.berkeley.edu!shirriff
- From: shirriff@sprite.berkeley.edu (Ken Shirriff)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Re: Any way to *CREATE* Vcr+ (VCR PLUS) codes??? (please read)
- Date: 4 Jan 1993 21:30:09 GMT
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
- Lines: 12
- Message-ID: <1iaa91INNhgr@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <Bzz4J5.FHD@news.udel.edu> <1992Dec31.031552.17197@netcom.com> <C0CED1.60H@metaflow.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hijack.berkeley.edu
- Keywords: VCR+ patent
-
- In article <C0CED1.60H@metaflow.com> rschnapp@metaflow.com (Russ Schnapp) writes:
- >Is it really necessary to reverse-engineer the VCR+ algorithm? I thought
- >that VCR+ is patented. If you can obtain the patent number, then the patent
- >can be retrieved. The patent _must_ disclose the method used.
-
- The patent doesn't include enough information to decode the VCR+ code.
- It explains how to make/decode _a_ VCR code, but not _the_ VCR+ code. That
- is, there are a bunch of specific details you need that aren't included. (As
- an analogy, the RSA patent won't help you decode a particular RSA-encoded
- message.)
-
- Ken Shirriff shirriff@sprite.Berkeley.EDU
-