home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!udel!gvls1!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!mjd
- From: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu ("[*] Lord of the Control-H")
- Newsgroups: pa.general
- Subject: Re: AC 215/610 Split
- Message-ID: <MJD.93Jan6163342@saul.cis.upenn.edu>
- Date: 6 Jan 93 21:33:42 GMT
- References: <1076@pacs.pha.pa.us> <1993Jan6.051317.29581@cronkite.ocis.temple.edu>
- <16B4EDEA7.STAN@VM.TEMPLE.EDU>
- Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
- Organization: Eaters of Wisdom
- Lines: 19
- Nntp-Posting-Host: saul.cis.upenn.edu
- In-reply-to: STAN@VM.TEMPLE.EDU's message of 6 Jan 93 20:49:42 GMT
-
- In article <16B4EDEA7.STAN@VM.TEMPLE.EDU> STAN@VM.TEMPLE.EDU (Stan Horwitz) writes:
- According to the news reports on KYW this morning, no additional phone
- charges will be leveid when calling between 610 and 215. This seems
- reasonable since other regions of the country have had similar area code
- rearangements and I haven't heard of any of those folks affected by those
- changes being asked to shell out more bucks to call phones that were once
- in the same area code.
-
- Oh? Very well.
-
- When New York City split from 212 to 212/718, the local phone
- company swore that they wouldn't raise the rates for out-of-area local
- calls. They didn't. Not for nearly a year.
-
- Now you've heard about it.
- --
-
- Nihil tam absurde dici potest, quod non dicatur ab aliquo philosophorum.
- Mark-Jason Dominus mjd@central.cis.upenn.edu
-